Battery state estimation device and method of estimating battery state

ABSTRACT

A battery state estimation device includes a detecting part, a state of charge (SOC) estimating part, an open circuit voltage (OCV) estimating part, a terminal voltage estimating part, and a correcting part. The detecting part detects a charge-discharge current and a terminal voltage of a battery. The SOC estimating part estimates an SOC of the battery, based on the charge-discharge current detected by the detecting part. The OCV estimating part estimates an OCV of the battery, based on the SOC estimated by the SOC estimating part and a relationship between an OCV and the SOC of the battery. The terminal voltage estimating part calculates an estimated terminal voltage, based on the charge-discharge current and the terminal voltage detected by the detecting part and on an equivalent circuit model constructed using an inversely proportional curve. The correcting part corrects the SOC estimated by the SOC estimating part, based on the estimated terminal voltage calculated by the terminal voltage estimating part and the terminal voltage detected by the detecting part.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a battery state estimation device for estimating an internal state of a battery with high accuracy, and to a method of estimating a battery state.

BACKGROUND ART

A vehicle powered primarily by an engine includes a battery serving as a power source for a starter motor used to start the engine. A typical example of such a battery is a lead-acid battery. In recent years, charge-discharge characteristics of a lead-acid battery have improved. With this improvement, a lead-acid battery is increasingly common as a power source for a special electric vehicle, such as an electric cart and a fork lift, which conventionally uses a lithium-ion secondary battery so expensive as to make the special electric vehicle unprofitable.

A dead battery or a battery that has been degraded in performance ranks first in a number of troubles that private vehicles suffer (specifically, the number indicates how many times Japan Automobile Federation (JAF) is called to come to the rescue of vehicles). In recent years, a stop-start system has become more common in a vehicle powered primarily by an engine in an effort to reduce emissions. However, while the stop-start system stops the engine, a remaining capacity of a battery may decrease to a point where the battery cannot generate an output high enough to restart the engine. Accordingly, it is desirable to detect a remaining capacity of a battery with high accuracy so that such a battery problem is prevented (see, for example, PTL 1).

Generally, an open circuit voltage (hereinafter referred to as “OCV”) and a remaining capacity of a lead-acid battery are known to be linearly related. PTL 1 describes a technique of calculating a remaining capacity, based on an OCV measured, using the linear relationship.

PTL 2 discloses an invention that accurately estimates a state of charge (hereinafter referred to as “SOC”), which is a remaining capacity of a battery, by constructing an equivalent circuit model of the battery in consideration of a polarization component and estimating an internal state of the battery with high accuracy.

CITATION LIST Patent Literature

PTL 1: WO 2008/152875

PTL 2: Japanese Patent No. 5, 291, 845

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention provide a battery state estimation device and a method of estimating a battery state which increase accuracy in both a terminal voltage estimation and an SOC estimation associated with the terminal voltage estimation by using a simple construction. The battery state estimation device according to the exemplary embodiments of the present invention includes a detecting part, an SOC estimating part, an OCV estimating part, a terminal voltage estimating part, and a correcting part. The detecting part detects a charge-discharge current and a terminal voltage of a battery. The SOC estimating part estimates an SOC of the battery, based on the charge-discharge current detected by the detecting part. The OCV estimating part estimates an OCV of the battery, based on the SOC estimated by the SOC estimating part and a relationship between an OCV and the SOC of the battery. The terminal voltage estimating part calculates an estimated terminal voltage, based on the charge-discharge current and the terminal voltage detected by the detecting part and an equivalent circuit model constructed using an inversely proportional curve (i.e., an equivalent circuit model constructed using a function that is inversely proportional to a power). The correcting part corrects the SOC estimated by the SOC estimating part, based on the estimated terminal voltage calculated by the terminal voltage estimating part and the terminal voltage detected by the detecting part.

A method of estimating a battery state according to the exemplary embodiments of the present invention includes the steps of: detecting a charge-discharge current and a terminal voltage of a battery; estimating an SOC of the battery, based on the charge-discharge current detected in the detecting step; estimating an OCV of the battery, based on the SOC estimated in the SOC estimating step and a relationship between an OCV and the SOC of the battery; calculating an estimated terminal voltage, based on the charge-discharge current and the terminal voltage detected in the detecting step and an equivalent circuit model constructed using an inversely proportional curve (i.e., an equivalent circuit model constructed using a function that is inversely proportional to a power); and correcting the SOC estimated in the SOC estimating step, based on the estimated terminal voltage calculated in the terminal voltage estimating step and the terminal voltage detected in the detecting step.

The exemplary embodiments of the present invention enable a state estimation that considers a slow-response component of a battery without using a higher-order equivalent circuit model. Consequently, accuracy in both a terminal voltage estimation and an associated SOC estimation for a battery improves by using a simple construction.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1A is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of a battery state estimation device according to a first exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 1B illustrates a processing algorithm of a Kalman filter SOC estimating part illustrated in FIG. 1A.

FIG. 2 illustrates a terminal voltage estimation model, which is a first-order equivalent circuit.

FIG. 3 illustrates an error between measured terminal voltages and terminal voltages estimated using the terminal voltage estimation model, which is the first-order equivalent circuit.

FIG. 4 is an enlarged view of a portion of FIG. 3 within a dotted line.

FIG. 5 illustrates a terminal voltage estimation model constructed using an inversely proportional curve.

FIG. 6 illustrates a comparison between terminal voltages estimated using the terminal voltage estimation model, which is the first-order equivalent circuit, and terminal voltages estimated using the terminal voltage estimation model constructed using the inversely proportional curve.

FIG. 7 illustrates an example of a function of the inversely proportional curve.

FIG. 8 illustrates examples of a function that is inversely proportional to a power.

FIG. 9 illustrates a comparison between estimated terminal voltages obtained by applying, to the terminal voltage estimation model constructed using the inversely proportional curve, a resistance value estimated using the terminal voltage estimation model, which is the first-order equivalent circuit, without correcting the resistance value.

FIG. 10 illustrates a comparison between estimated terminal voltages obtained by correcting and applying, to the terminal voltage estimation model constructed using the inversely proportional curve, a resistance value estimated using the terminal voltage estimation model, which is the first-order equivalent circuit.

FIG. 11 illustrates an error between measured terminal voltages and terminal voltages estimated with the terminal voltage estimation model constructed using the inversely proportional curve.

FIG. 12 is an enlarged view of a portion of FIG. 11 within a dotted line.

FIG. 13 is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of a battery state estimation device according to a second exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 14 illustrates a processing algorithm of a Kalman filter SOC estimating part illustrated in FIG. 13.

FIG. 15 illustrates a processing algorithm of an OCV-SOC estimating part illustrated in FIG. 13.

FIG. 16 illustrates a processing algorithm of a remaining battery capacity estimating part illustrated in FIG. 13.

DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

Before describing exemplary embodiments of the present invention, a disadvantage with a conventional battery state estimation device will be described. Conventionally, a terminal voltage is estimated by identifying parameters of a battery model in an SOC estimation using a Kalman filter, as described in the PTL 2. However, a first-order equivalent circuit model constructed using an exponential function cannot express a slow-response component (i.e., a polarization relaxation component) when estimating a terminal voltage. Expressing the slow-response component requires a higher-order equivalent circuit model, which greatly increases computational effort and processing time for an ECU (Electrical Control Unit) having a limited processing capacity, making the estimation impractical.

The exemplary embodiments of the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. It should be noted that the exemplary embodiments described below are by way of example and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention. In the accompanying drawings, like numerals denote similar elements, and description of the similar elements will not be repeated as appropriate.

First Exemplary Embodiment

FIG. 1A is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of a battery state estimation device according to a first exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The battery state estimation device is, for example, an ECU. The battery state estimation device includes sensor 100, ARX (Autoregressive Exogenous) model identifying part 101, equivalent circuit parameter estimating part 102, OCV-SOC map storing part 103, Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104, and error calculating part 105. Sensor 100 measures a charge-discharge current and a terminal voltage of a battery (e.g., a secondary rechargeable battery such as a lead-acid battery used for activating a stop-start system). Sensor 100 includes, for example, a current sensor and a voltage sensor. Charge-discharge current i_(L) and terminal voltage v_(T) measured by sensor 100 are output, as appropriate, to ARX model identifying part 101, equivalent circuit parameter estimating part 102, OCV-SOC map storing part 103, Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104, and error calculating part 105. Charge-discharge current i_(L) and terminal voltage v_(T) are used in computations performed by the respective parts.

ARX model identifying part 101, equivalent circuit parameter estimating part 102, OCV-SOC map storing part 103, Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104, and error calculating part 105 are each constituted by hardware including a central processing unit (CPU), a memory, and a random access memory (RAM), which are all not shown. The hardware components may be consolidated into an integrated circuit (e.g., a large scale integration (LSI)). ARX model identifying part 101, equivalent circuit parameter estimating part 102, OCV-SOC map storing part 103, Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104, and error calculating part 105 each include, as software, programs. The computations are processed by the CPU, based on pre-stored data and programs stored on the memory (not shown). Results of the computations are temporarily stored on the RAM (not shown) for subsequent processes.

FIG. 2 illustrates a terminal voltage estimation model, which is a first-order equivalent circuit. A state space representation of the model is given by the following formula:

$\begin{matrix} {{\left\lbrack \begin{matrix} {{SOC}\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} \\ {b_{0}\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} \\ {V_{{RC}\; 1}\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} \end{matrix} \right\rbrack = {{\left\lbrack \begin{matrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & {1 - \frac{\Delta \; t}{R_{1}C_{1}}} \end{matrix} \right\rbrack\left\lbrack \begin{matrix} {{SOC}\lbrack k\rbrack} \\ {b_{0}\lbrack k\rbrack} \\ {V_{{RC}\; 1}\lbrack k\rbrack} \end{matrix} \right\rbrack} + {\left\lbrack \begin{matrix} \frac{{- \Delta}\; t}{Q_{R}} \\ 0 \\ \frac{\Delta \; t}{C_{1}} \end{matrix} \right\rbrack  {i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}}} \mspace{79mu} {{v_{T}\lbrack k\rbrack} = {{\begin{bmatrix} b_{1} & 1 & {- 1} \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} {{SOC}\lbrack k\rbrack} \\ {b_{0}\lbrack k\rbrack} \\ {V_{{RC}\; 1}\lbrack k\rbrack} \end{bmatrix}} - {R_{0}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\mspace{14mu} 1} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

In the formula, QR is a nominal capacity of a battery.

Equivalent circuit parameters of the first-order equivalent circuit model are estimated by comparing a transfer function calculated by ARX model identifying part 101 with a transfer function calculated by equivalent circuit parameter estimating part 102.

A process performed by ARX model identifying part 101 will be described. ARX model identifying part 101 identifies an ARX model by using a known least squares method. This processing is performed by referring to, for example, a publicly available non-patent literature: H. Rahimi Eichi and M.-Y. Chow, “Adaptive Online Battery Parameters/SOC/Capacity Co-estimation” IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC), 2013. For the ARX model, the following polynomials of z⁻¹ are used.

A(z)=1+a ₁ z ⁻¹ + . . . +a _(p) z ^(−p)

B(z)=b ₀ +b ₁ z ⁻¹ + . . . +b _(q) z ^(−q)  [Formula 2]

The ARX model is a class in which a relationship between input u(k) and output y(k) is modelled as follows:

A(z)y(k)=B(z)u(k)+e(k)  [Formula 3]

With the following formula, regression coefficients a₁, . . . , a_(p), b₀, . . . , b_(q) are determined so that y(k)−Φ(k)θ is minimum.

y(k)=[−y(k−1) . . . −y(k−p)u(k) . . . u(k−q)][a ₁ . . . a _(p) b ₀ . . . b _(q)]^(T) +e(k)≡Φ(k)θ+e(k)  [Formula 4]

When the parameter is estimated from multiple data sets, the following formulae are used.

$\begin{matrix} {\left\lbrack \begin{matrix} {y(k)} \\ {y\left( {k - 1} \right)} \\ \vdots \end{matrix} \right\rbrack = {\left. {{\left\lbrack \begin{matrix} {- {y\left( {k - 1} \right)}} & {- {y\left( {k - 2} \right)}} & \ldots \\ {- {y\left( {k - 2} \right)}} & {- {y\left( {k - 3} \right)}} & \; \\ \vdots & \; & \ddots \end{matrix} \right\rbrack\left\lbrack \begin{matrix} a_{1} \\ a_{2} \\ \vdots \end{matrix} \right\rbrack} + \left\lbrack \begin{matrix} {e(k)} \\ {e\left( {k - 1} \right)} \\ \vdots \end{matrix} \right\rbrack}\Rightarrow y \right. = {{\Phi \; \theta} + e}}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\mspace{14mu} 5} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$ min∥e∥ ²=min∥y−Φθ∥ ²

θ=(Φ^(T)Φ)⁻¹Φ^(T) y  [Formula 6]

A transfer function of the ARX model is given by the following formula:

$\begin{matrix} {{G(z)} = \frac{B(z)}{A(z)}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\mspace{14mu} 7} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

ARX model identifying part 101 performs a digital z-transformation on an amount of change in charge-discharge current i_(L) and terminal voltage v_(T) output from sensor 100 so that the following formula is obtained:

$\begin{matrix} {\frac{\Delta \; {v_{T}\lbrack z\rbrack}}{\Delta \; {i_{L}\lbrack z\rbrack}} = \frac{c_{0} + {c_{1}z^{- 1}}}{1 + {a_{1}z^{- 1}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\mspace{14mu} 8} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

With this formula, coefficients a₁, c₀, c₁ are calculated.

Equivalent circuit parameter identifying part 102 estimates parameters of an equivalent circuit by comparing the transfer function of the ARX model with a transfer function of an equivalent circuit. This relationship is given by the following formula:

$\begin{matrix} {\frac{\Delta \; {v_{T}\lbrack z\rbrack}}{\Delta \; {i_{L}\lbrack z\rbrack}} = {\frac{c_{0} + {c_{1}z^{- 1}}}{1 + {a_{1}z^{- 1}}} = \frac{{- R_{0}} + {\begin{Bmatrix} {{- \frac{\Delta \; t}{C_{1}}} -} \\ {R_{0}\left( {\frac{\Delta \; t}{R_{1}C_{1}} - 1} \right)} \end{Bmatrix}z^{- 1}}}{1 + {\left( {\frac{\Delta \; t}{R_{1}C_{1}} - 1} \right)z^{- 1}}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\mspace{14mu} 9} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

This formula is derived as follows:

v _(T) [k]−v _(T) [k−1]=−V _(RC1) [k]+V _(RC1) [k−1]−R ₀(i _(L) [k]−i _(L) [k−1])  [Formula 10]

where

v _(T) [k]=b ₁ SOC[k]+b ₀ [k]−V _(RC1) [k]−R ₀ i _(L) [k]=v _(OC) [k]−V _(RC1) [k]−R ₀ i _(L) [k]

v _(T) [k]−v _(T) [k−1]=v _(OC) [k]−v _(OC) [k−1]−V _(RC1) [k]+V _(RC1) [k−1]−R ₀(i _(L) [k]−i _(L) [k−1])

v _(OC) [k]−v _(OC) [k−1]≈0

Z-transformation is performed

${{zV}_{{RC}\; 1}\lbrack z\rbrack} = {\left. {{\left( {1 - \frac{\Delta \; t}{R_{1}C_{1}}} \right){V_{{RC}\; 1}\lbrack z\rbrack}} + {\frac{\Delta \; t}{C_{1}}{i_{L}\lbrack z\rbrack}}}\rightarrow{V_{{RC}\; 1}\lbrack z\rbrack} \right. = {\frac{\frac{\Delta \; t}{C_{1}}z^{- 1}}{1 + {\left( {\frac{\Delta \; t}{R_{1}C_{1}} - 1} \right)z^{- 1}}}{i_{L}\lbrack z\rbrack}}}$ ${{v_{r}\lbrack z\rbrack}\left( {1 - z^{- 1}} \right)} = {{{{- {V_{{RC}\; 1}\lbrack z\rbrack}}\left( {1 - z^{- 1}} \right)} - {R_{0}{i_{L}\lbrack z\rbrack}\left( {1 - z^{- 1}} \right)}} = {{\frac{{- \frac{\Delta \; t}{C_{1}}}z^{- 1}}{1 + {\left( {\frac{\Delta \; t}{R_{1}C_{1}} - 1} \right)z^{- 1}}}{i_{L}\lbrack z\rbrack}\left( {1 - z^{- 1}} \right)} - {R_{0}{i_{L}\lbrack z\rbrack}{\quad\left( {1 - z^{- 1}} \right.}\left. \quad \right)}}}$ $\frac{{v_{T}\lbrack z\rbrack}\left( {1 - z^{- 1}} \right)}{{i_{L}\lbrack z\rbrack}\left( {1 - z^{- 1}} \right)} = {\frac{\Delta \; {v_{T}\lbrack z\rbrack}}{\Delta \; {i_{L}\lbrack z\rbrack}} = {{\frac{{- \frac{\Delta \; t}{C_{1}}}z^{- 1}}{1 + {\left( {\frac{\Delta \; t}{R_{1}C_{1}} - 1} \right)z^{- 1}}} - R_{0}} = \frac{{- R_{0}} + {\left\{ {{- \frac{\Delta \; t}{C_{1}}} - {R_{0}\left( {\frac{\Delta \; t}{R_{1}C_{1}} - 1} \right)}} \right\} z^{- 1}}}{1 + {\left( {\frac{\Delta \; t}{R_{1}C_{1}} - 1} \right)z^{- 1}}}}}$

Equivalent circuit parameter estimating part 102 estimates parameters R₀, R₁, C₁ of the equivalent circuit model illustrated in FIG. 2, based on the formula, and outputs the estimated parameters to Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104. ARX model identifying part 101 and equivalent circuit parameter estimating part 102 perform the processes with a predetermined sampling period of, for example, 0.05 [s] to update the parameters.

OCV-SOC map storing part 103 outputs, to Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104, information on an OCV-SOC map that OCV-SOC map storing part 103 pre-stores and which indicates a relationship between an OCV and an SOC. In the map, the OCV-SOC relationship is indicated by a linear function.

Additionally, a lower limit of an OCV indicated by the function and a gradient of the function are respectively preset to b₀ and b₁. OCV-SOC map storing part 103 outputs the preset values to ARX model identifying part 101 and equivalent circuit parameter estimating part 102. In the present exemplary embodiment, at least the regression coefficient needs to be output as the OCV-SOC map from OCV-SOC map storing part 103. This applies to the other exemplary embodiment. With regard to the information on the OCV-SOC map, a map may be selected, or a plurality of maps may be selected based on a type of a battery. For example, OCV-SOC map storing part 103 may determine a type of a battery, based on measured charge-discharge current value i_(L) and measured terminal voltage value v_(T) output from sensor 100, and select an OCV-SOC map corresponding to the type of the battery. This configuration prevents or inhibits decrease in accuracy in an SOC estimation even if the battery is replaced.

A process performed by Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104 will be described in detail. Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104 estimates a terminal voltage and an SOC by using the following state-space representation:

$\begin{matrix} \begin{pmatrix} {{x\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} = {{{Ax}\lbrack k\rbrack} + {{bu}\lbrack k\rbrack}}} \\ {y = {{{cx}\lbrack k\rbrack} + {{du}\lbrack k\rbrack}}} \end{pmatrix} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\mspace{14mu} 11} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

Specifically, with the state-space representation serving as a formula of a first-order equivalent circuit model, Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104 performs the estimations by using the following formulae, as will be described in detail later.

$\begin{matrix} {{\left\lbrack \begin{matrix} {{SOC}\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} \\ {b_{0}\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} \\ {V_{{RC}\;}\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} \end{matrix} \right\rbrack = {{\left\lbrack \begin{matrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & {1 - \frac{\Delta \; t}{R_{1}C_{1}}} \end{matrix} \right\rbrack\left\lbrack \begin{matrix} {{SOC}\lbrack k\rbrack} \\ {b_{0}\lbrack k\rbrack} \\ {V_{{RC}_{1}}\lbrack k\rbrack} \end{matrix} \right\rbrack} + {\left\lbrack \begin{matrix} \frac{{- \Delta}\; t}{Q_{R}} \\ 0 \\ \frac{\Delta \; t}{C_{1}} \end{matrix} \right\rbrack  {i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}} + {{g\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack}{e\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack}}}}\mspace{79mu} {{v_{T}\lbrack k\rbrack} = {{\begin{bmatrix} b_{1} & 1 & {- 1} \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} {{SOC}\lbrack k\rbrack} \\ {b_{0}\lbrack k\rbrack} \\ {V_{{RC}_{1}}\lbrack k\rbrack} \end{bmatrix}} - {R_{0}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\mspace{14mu} 12} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

As a processing algorithm, current integration SOC estimation processing 200, estimated value correction processing 201, OCV estimation processing 202, inversely proportional curve-applied model processing 203, and Kalman gain processing 204 are performed. In current integration SOC estimation processing 200, Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104 estimates an SOC by integrating charge-discharge current i_(L) output from sensor 100. In estimated value correction processing 201, Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104 corrects an estimated SOC′ by using a Kalman gain described later. The resultant estimated SOC is output as a present SOC to an external element. In OCV estimation processing 202, Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104 calculates an estimated OCV, based on an OCV-SOC map output from OCV-SOC map storing part 103 and on the resultant estimated SOC. In inversely proportional curve-applied model processing 203, Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104 calculates an estimated terminal voltage, based on equivalent circuit parameters output from equivalent circuit parameter estimating part 102, charge-discharge current value i_(L) output from sensor 100, and an estimated OCV output in OCV estimation processing 202. Error calculating part 105 calculates error e[k] between the estimated terminal voltage and terminal voltage v_(T) output from sensor 100. In Kalman gain processing 204, Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104 corrects error e[k] by multiplying error e[k] by Kalman gain g[k].

FIG. 3 illustrates an error between measured terminal voltage v_(T) and terminal voltage v_(T) estimated using the terminal voltage estimation model (the first-order equivalent circuit) illustrated in FIG. 2. FIG. 4 is an enlarged view of a portion of FIG. 3 within a dotted line. As shown in FIGS. 3 and 4, the error between the estimated values and the measured values increases over time because a first-order equivalent circuit constructed using an exponential function (Exp function) cannot express a polarization component of a long time constant.

To enable the expression of the polarization component, Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104, in performing inversely proportional curve-applied model processing 203, estimates a terminal voltage and an SOC, using a terminal voltage estimation model constructed using an inversely proportional curve.

FIG. 5 illustrates the terminal voltage estimation model constructed using the inversely proportional curve. As illustrated in FIG. 5, in the terminal voltage estimation model that is constructed using an inversely proportional curve and is used in inversely proportional curve-applied model processing 203, a first-order resistor-capacitor parallel circuit (illustrated in FIG. 2) is replaced with inversely proportional curve-applied part 500. This terminal voltage estimation model constructed using the inversely proportional curve can express a slow-response component of a battery without using a higher-order resistor-capacitor parallel circuit.

FIG. 6 illustrates a comparison between terminal voltages estimated with the terminal voltage estimation model, which is the first-order equivalent circuit, and terminal voltages estimated with the terminal voltage estimation model constructed using the inversely proportional curve. As illustrated in FIG. 6, an Exp curve obtained with the terminal voltage estimation model, which is the first-order equivalent circuit, converges more rapidly over time than does an inversely proportional curve obtained with the terminal voltage estimation model constructed using the inversely proportional curve. This characteristic makes it difficult for the Exp curve to express a slow-response component of a battery. On the other hand, the inversely proportional curve converges more slowly than does the Exp curve. This characteristic enables the inversely proportional curve to be variable when the Exp curve has converged and thus to express a slow-response component of a battery (as shown in a dotted box).

In inversely proportional curve-applied model processing 203, a present state estimation value and a state estimation value one step later are obtained using a Kalman filter from a present input value, a measured value, and a state estimation value one step before. In the present exemplary embodiment, an extended Kalman filter is used for a terminal voltage estimation model constructed using a non-linear inversely proportional curve. With the processing performed in inversely proportional curve-applied model processing 203, a difference between target value R₁ i_(L)[k] of a terminal voltage and present value v is reduced, and an error is reduced according the difference, which is either positive or negative.

FIG. 7 illustrates an example of a function of the inversely proportional curve. As illustrated in FIG. 7, an inversely proportional curve of y=K/x is used, where K is a proportionality constant.

If the error is zero or positive (i.e., present value≧target value), the inversely proportional curve of y=K/x is used. If the error is negative (i.e., present value<target value), an inversely proportional curve of y=−K/x is used.

Specifically, if present value≧target value, for example, a computation is performed as follows:

$\begin{matrix} {\mspace{79mu} {{{y = {\frac{K}{x} \equiv {v - \begin{matrix} {target} \\ {value} \end{matrix}}}},{\overset{.}{v} = {- \frac{K}{x^{2}}}}}\mspace{79mu} {\frac{{v\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} - {v\lbrack k\rbrack}}{\Delta \; t} = {- \frac{K}{{x\lbrack k\rbrack} \cdot {x\lbrack k\rbrack}}}}\mspace{79mu} {{x\lbrack k\rbrack} = \frac{K}{{v\lbrack k\rbrack} - {{target}\mspace{14mu} {value}}}}{\frac{{v\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} - {v\lbrack k\rbrack}}{\Delta \; t} = {{- \frac{1}{K}}\left( {{v\lbrack k\rbrack} - {R_{1}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}} \right)^{2}\mspace{14mu} \left( \left. {\begin{matrix} {target} \\ {value} \end{matrix} \equiv {R_{1}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}} \right) \right.}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\mspace{14mu} 13} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

If present value<target value, a computation is performed as follows:

$\begin{matrix} {{{y = {{- \frac{K}{x}} \equiv {v - \begin{matrix} {target} \\ {value} \end{matrix}}}},{\overset{.}{v} = \frac{K}{x^{2}}}}{\frac{{v\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} - {v\lbrack k\rbrack}}{\Delta \; t} = {\frac{1}{K}\left( {{v\lbrack k\rbrack} - {R_{1}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}} \right)^{2}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\mspace{14mu} 14} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

The formulae are combined and processed as follows:

$\begin{matrix} {{{e\lbrack k\rbrack} = {{v\lbrack k\rbrack} - {R_{1}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}}}{\frac{{v\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} - {v\lbrack k\rbrack}}{\Delta \; t} = {{- {{sign}\left( {e\lbrack k\rbrack} \right)}} \cdot \frac{{e\lbrack k\rbrack}^{2}}{K}}}{{v\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} = {{v\lbrack k\rbrack} - {{{{sign}\left( {e\lbrack k\rbrack} \right)} \cdot \frac{{e\lbrack k\rbrack}^{2}}{K^{\prime}}}\mspace{14mu} \left( {K^{\prime} = \frac{K}{\Delta \; t}} \right)}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\mspace{14mu} 15} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

First Modified Example

As the inversely proportional curve, the function, y=K/x, may be replaced with a function, y=K/xp, that is inversely proportional to a power. If present value≧target value in that case, a computation is performed as follows:

$\begin{matrix} {{{y = {\frac{K}{x^{p}} \equiv {v - \begin{matrix} {target} \\ {value} \end{matrix}}}},\mspace{14mu} {\overset{.}{v} = {- \frac{pK}{x^{p + 1}}}}}{\frac{{v\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} - {v\lbrack k\rbrack}}{\Delta \; t} = {- \frac{pK}{{x\lbrack k\rbrack}^{p + 1}}}}{{x\lbrack k\rbrack}^{p} = \frac{K}{{{v\lbrack k\rbrack} - \begin{matrix} {target} \\ {value} \end{matrix}}}}{\frac{{v\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} - {v\lbrack k\rbrack}}{\Delta \; t} = {- \frac{p{{{v\lbrack k\rbrack} - {R_{1}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}}}^{\frac{p + 1}{p}}}{\sqrt[p]{K}}}}\left( {\begin{matrix} {target} \\ {value} \end{matrix} \equiv {R_{1}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}} \right)} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\mspace{14mu} 16} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

If present value<target value, a computation is performed as follows:

$\begin{matrix} {{{y = {{- \frac{K}{x^{p}}} \equiv {v - \begin{matrix} {target} \\ {value} \end{matrix}}}},\mspace{20mu} {\overset{.}{v} = \frac{pK}{x^{p + 1}}}}{{x\lbrack k\rbrack}^{p} = \frac{K}{{{v\lbrack k\rbrack} - \begin{matrix} {target} \\ {value} \end{matrix}}}}{\frac{{v\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} - {v\lbrack k\rbrack}}{\Delta \; t} = \frac{p{{{v\lbrack k\rbrack} - {R_{1}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}}}^{\frac{p + 1}{p}}}{\sqrt[p]{K}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\mspace{14mu} 17} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

The formulae are combined and processed as follows:

$\begin{matrix} {{{e\lbrack k\rbrack} = {{v\lbrack k\rbrack} - {R_{1}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}}}{\frac{{v\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} - {v\lbrack k\rbrack}}{\Delta \; t} = {{- {sign}}{\left( {e\lbrack k\rbrack} \right) \cdot \frac{p{{e\lbrack k\rbrack}}^{\frac{p + 1}{p}}}{\sqrt[p]{K}}}}}{{v\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} = {{v\lbrack k\rbrack} - {{{sign}\left( {e\lbrack k\rbrack} \right)} \cdot \frac{p{{e\lbrack k\rbrack}}^{\frac{p + 1}{p}}\Delta \; t}{\sqrt[p]{K}}}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\mspace{14mu} 18} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

FIG. 8 illustrates an example of a function that is inversely proportional to a power. As illustrated in FIG. 8, in inversely proportional curve-applied model processing 203, multiplier p appropriate to a function inversely proportional to a power may be set, based on at least one of conditions including an estimated SOC, an estimated terminal voltage, and a type of a battery. For example, Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104 may set larger multiplier p for a battery in which an amount of change in a slow-response component is large.

Second Modified Example

In the above computation, x[k]·x[k] may be replaced with x[k]·x[k+1]. If present value≧target value in that case, a computation is performed as follows:

$\begin{matrix} {\mspace{79mu} {{{y = {\frac{K}{x} \equiv {v - \begin{matrix} {target} \\ {value} \end{matrix}}}},\mspace{14mu} {\overset{.}{v} = {- \frac{K}{x^{2}}}}}\mspace{79mu} {\frac{{v\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} - {v\lbrack k\rbrack}}{\Delta \; t} = {- \frac{K}{{x\lbrack k\rbrack} \cdot {x\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack}}}}\mspace{79mu} {{{x\lbrack k\rbrack} = \frac{K}{{v\lbrack k\rbrack} - \begin{matrix} {target} \\ {value} \end{matrix}}},{{x\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} = \frac{K}{{v\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} - \begin{matrix} {target} \\ {value} \end{matrix}}}}{\frac{{v\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} - {v\lbrack k\rbrack}}{\Delta \; t} = {{- \frac{1}{K}}\left( {{v\lbrack k\rbrack} - {R_{1}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}} \right)\left( {{v\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} - {R_{1}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}} \right)}}\mspace{79mu} \left( {\begin{matrix} {target} \\ {value} \end{matrix} \equiv {R_{1}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}} \right)}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\mspace{14mu} 19} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

If present value<target value, a computation is performed as follows:

$\begin{matrix} {\mspace{79mu} {{{y = {{- \frac{K}{x}} \equiv {v - \begin{matrix} {target} \\ {value} \end{matrix}}}},\mspace{14mu} {\overset{.}{v} = \frac{K}{x^{2}}}}{\frac{{v\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} - {v\lbrack k\rbrack}}{\Delta \; t} = {\frac{1}{K}\left( {{v\lbrack k\rbrack} - {R_{1}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}} \right)\left( {{v\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} - {R_{1}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}} \right)}}{\frac{{v\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} - {v\lbrack k\rbrack}}{\Delta \; t} = {{- \frac{1}{K}}\left( {{R_{1}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}} - {v\lbrack k\rbrack}} \right)\left( {{v\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} - {R_{1}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}} \right)}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\mspace{14mu} 20} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

The formulae are combined and processed as follows:

$\begin{matrix} {\mspace{79mu} {{{e\lbrack k\rbrack} = {{v\lbrack k\rbrack} - {R_{1}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}}}\mspace{79mu} {\frac{{v\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} - {v\lbrack k\rbrack}}{\Delta \; t} = {{- \frac{1}{K}}{{e\lbrack k\rbrack}}\left( {{v\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} - {R_{1}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}} \right)}}\mspace{79mu} {{\left( {1 + {\frac{\Delta \; t}{K}{{e\lbrack k\rbrack}}}} \right){v\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack}} = {{v\lbrack k\rbrack} + {\frac{\Delta \; t}{K}{{e\lbrack k\rbrack}}R_{1}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\mspace{14mu} 21} \right\rbrack \\ {{{v\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} = {{{\frac{K^{\prime}}{K^{\prime} + {{e\lbrack k\rbrack}}}{v\lbrack k\rbrack}} + {\frac{{{e\lbrack k\rbrack}}R_{1}}{K^{\prime} + {{e\lbrack k\rbrack}}}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}} = {\frac{K^{\prime}{e\lbrack k\rbrack}}{K^{\prime} + {{e\lbrack k\rbrack}}} + {R_{1}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}}}}\mspace{79mu} \left( {K^{\prime} = \frac{K}{\Delta \; t}} \right)} & \; \end{matrix}$

A description will be given of a state-space representation of a terminal voltage estimation model that is constructed using an inversely proportional curve, the state-space representation being used by Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104.

The following formula is used for calculating an OCV.

$\begin{matrix} {{x_{1}\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} = {\quad{\begin{bmatrix} {{SOC}\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} \\ {b_{0}\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} \end{bmatrix} = {{\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} {{SOC}\lbrack k\rbrack} \\ {b_{0}\lbrack k\rbrack} \end{bmatrix}} + {\begin{bmatrix} \frac{{- \Delta}\; t}{Q_{R}} \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\mspace{14mu} 22} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

The following formula is used for calculating a polarization component.

$\begin{matrix} {{x_{2}\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} = {\begin{bmatrix} {v\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} \\ {K\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} \end{bmatrix} = {\quad\begin{bmatrix} {{v\lbrack k\rbrack} - {{{sign}\left( {{v\lbrack k\rbrack} - {R_{1}^{\prime}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}} \right)} \cdot \frac{\left( {{v\lbrack k\rbrack} - {R_{1}^{\prime}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}} \right)^{2}\Delta \; t}{K\lbrack k\rbrack}}} \\ {K\lbrack k\rbrack} \end{bmatrix}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\mspace{14mu} 23} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

The formulae are used to form the following formula for expressing an estimated terminal voltage.

$\begin{matrix} {{v_{T}\lbrack k\rbrack} = {{\begin{bmatrix} b_{1} & 1 & {- 1} & 0 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} {x_{1}\lbrack k\rbrack} \\ {x_{2}\lbrack k\rbrack} \end{bmatrix}} - {R_{0}{i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\mspace{14mu} 24} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

Then, the formula for calculating a polarization component becomes the following non-linear space representation:

$\begin{matrix} \begin{bmatrix} {v\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} \\ {K\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} \end{bmatrix} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\mspace{14mu} 25} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

In this case, proportionality constant k cannot be identified with an ARX model. In order to make the identification possible, Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104 includes constant proportionality k in a state vector, and performs a simultaneous optimization using an extended Kalman filter.

A description will be given of resistance R₁′ of an inversely proportional curve in the formula for calculating a polarization component. Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104 corrects R₁′ so that R₁′ equals a value that is obtained by multiplying, by a constant, resistance value R₁ of a first-order equivalent circuit which is estimated by equivalent circuit parameter estimating part 102. The factor of correction may be changed in charging and discharging because an attenuation characteristic of a terminal voltage is different in both the operations.

FIG. 9 illustrates a comparison between terminal voltages obtained by applying, to the terminal voltage estimation model constructed using the inversely proportional curve, a resistance value estimated with the terminal voltage estimation model, which is the first-order equivalent circuit, without correcting the resistance value. FIG. 10 illustrates a comparison between terminal voltages obtained by correcting and applying, to the terminal voltage estimation model constructed using the inversely proportional curve, a resistance value estimated with the terminal voltage estimation model, which is the first-order equivalent circuit. In the Exp curve (illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 4) corresponding to the terminal voltage estimation model, which is the first-order equivalent circuit, for example, terminal voltages are expressed with relatively high accuracy at a fast-response portion of a battery, as illustrated in FIG. 9. As illustrated in FIG. 9, with an inversely proportional curve corresponding to the terminal voltage estimation model constructed using the inversely proportional curve, an amount of change in voltages is kept from converging even at a slow-response portion of a battery, so that terminal voltages are accurately estimated. With the Exp curve corresponding to the terminal voltage estimation model, which is the first-order equivalent circuit, a polarization component is estimated with relatively high accuracy at the fast-response portion of the battery (a portion within a dotted line). With the inversely proportional curve, a polarization component is estimated with relatively low accuracy because the inversely proportional curve uses the same resistance R₁ of the first-order equivalent circuit as that of the Exp curve, which causes the inversely proportional curve to converge to a value identical to that reached by the Exp curve and thus to have an amount of change small at the fast-response portion of the battery. As illustrated in FIG. 10, the inversely proportional curve overlaps the Exp curve at an early part of the fast-response portion of the battery (a portion within a dotted line). In order to achieve this, Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104 corrects resistance R1′ of the inversely proportional curve so that resistance R1′ equals a value obtained by multiplying, by a constant, resistance R1 of the first-order equivalent circuit.

FIG. 11 illustrates an error between measured terminal voltages and terminal voltages estimated with the terminal voltage estimation model constructed using the inversely proportional curve. FIG. 12 is an enlarged view of a portion of FIG. 11 within a dotted line. As illustrated in FIGS. 11 and 12, a polarization component of a long time constant is estimated with high accuracy.

As described above, in the present exemplary embodiment, a terminal voltage is estimated using the equivalent circuit model constructed using the inversely proportional curve. This configuration enables a state estimation that considers a slow-response component of a battery, without using a higher-order equivalent circuit model. Accordingly, the first-order equivalent circuit model of simple construction enables a terminal voltage estimation and an associated SOC estimation for a battery. The present exemplary embodiment is applicable to an ECU that is designed for a stop-start system and which is limited in its processing ability because the present exemplary embodiment keeps an operational load low while preventing or inhibiting decrease in accuracy of the estimations.

Second Exemplary Embodiment

With regard to a battery state estimation device (illustrated in FIG. 13) according to a second exemplary embodiment, configurations and elements are identical to those of the first exemplary embodiment, except that remaining battery capacity estimating part 106 and OCV-SOC map estimating part 110 perform their processes, and Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104 performs estimation in a different way.

The identical elements are given like reference numerals, and will not be described in detail.

Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104 illustrated in FIG. 14 estimates an SOC using an OCV-SOC map (OCV=b₀+b₁*SOC) subjected to a linear approximation. Compared with the formulae (Formula 22 to Formula 25) of the first exemplary embodiment, a formula for calculating an OCV (Formula 22) and a formula for estimating a terminal voltage (Formula 24) in the present exemplary embodiment are different from those of the first exemplary embodiment in that the formulae (Formula 22 and Formula 24) in the first exemplary embodiment include b₀ in a state vector whereas the formulae (Formula 22 and Formula 24) in the present exemplary embodiment include b₀ in an input vector. Specifically, the OCV calculation in the present exemplary embodiment is given by the following formula:

$\begin{matrix} {{x_{1}\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} = {{{SOC}\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} = {{{SOC}\lbrack k\rbrack} + {\begin{bmatrix} \frac{{- \Delta}\; t}{Q_{R}\lbrack k\rbrack} & 0 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} {i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack} \\ {b_{0}\lbrack k\rbrack} \end{bmatrix}}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\mspace{14mu} 26} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

The terminal voltage estimation in the present exemplary embodiment is given by the following formula:

$\begin{matrix} {{v_{T}\lbrack k\rbrack} = {{\begin{bmatrix} {b_{1}\lbrack k\rbrack} & {- 1} & 0 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} {x_{1}\lbrack k\rbrack} \\ {x_{2}\lbrack k\rbrack} \end{bmatrix}} + {\begin{bmatrix} {- R_{0}} & 1 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} {i_{L}\lbrack k\rbrack} \\ {b_{0}\lbrack k\rbrack} \end{bmatrix}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\mspace{14mu} 27} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

Although the OCV-SOC map subjected to a linear approximation is used for ease of calculation, a polynomial of degree n (OCV=b₀+b₁*SOC+b₂*SOC²+ . . . +b_(N)*SOC^(N)) may instead be used.

In performing error calculation processing 205, Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104 calculates an estimated polarization voltage, based on an error between an estimated OCV estimated in OCV estimation process 202 and an estimated terminal voltage estimated in inversely proportional curve-applied model processing 203, and outputs the estimated polarization voltage. Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104 calculates the estimated polarization voltage using, for example, the following formula:

v _(p) [k]=v[k]+R ₀ i _(L) [k] or v _(p) [k]=(R ₀ +R ₁)i _(L) [k]  [Formula 28]

Remaining battery capacity estimating part 106 illustrated in FIG. 16 estimates a remaining battery capacity so that an estimated SOC estimated by Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104 equals an estimated SOC obtained using a current integration method. An equation of state is given by:

$\begin{matrix} {{x\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} = {{x\lbrack k\rbrack} = \frac{1}{Q_{R}\lbrack k\rbrack}}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\mspace{14mu} 29} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

An output equation is given by:

SOC _(cc) [k]=SOC _(cc) [k−1]−i _(L) [k]Δt·x[k]  [Formula 30]

Formula 30 satisfies the following formula:

SOC _(cc)[0]=SOC[l]  [Formula 31]

SOC [l] corresponds to an estimated SOC that is output from Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104 when remaining battery capacity estimating part 106 starts estimation. The estimation by remaining battery capacity estimating part 106 is timed to start in this way because there are time delays between the estimation by remaining battery capacity estimating part 106 and the estimation by Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104.

A process (illustrated in FIG. 16) performed by remaining battery capacity estimating part 106 will be described. First, an estimated remaining capacity of a battery is calculated in remaining capacity estimation processing 400. Then, in current integration SOC estimation processing 401, an estimated SOC is estimated using a current integration method from the estimated remaining capacity of the battery and charge-discharge current value i_(L) of the battery output from sensor 100. Then, in error calculation processing 403, an error is calculated between the estimated SOC estimated in current integration SOC estimation processing 401 and an estimated SOC estimated by Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104. Then, in Kalman gain processing 404, a correction rate is calculated for the estimated SOC, based on the calculated error. Then, in estimated value correction processing 402, the remaining capacity estimated in remaining capacity estimation processing 400 is corrected at the correction rate calculated in Kalman gain processing 404.

Preferably, remaining battery capacity estimating part 106 operates to perform the estimation processing over a longer period than does Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104. With regard to a change in a characteristic, a time constant of a remaining battery capacity is longer than that of an SOC. Accordingly, if remaining battery capacity estimating part 106 operates to perform the estimation processing over a period identical to that of Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104, results of the estimation by remaining battery capacity estimating part 106 vary greatly, reducing accuracy in the estimation. The prediction accuracy is prevented from decreasing by configuring remaining battery capacity estimation part 106 to operate to perform the estimation processing over a longer period than that of Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104.

OCV-SOC map estimating part 110 illustrated in FIG. 15 reads an OCV-SOC map from OCV-SOC map storing part 103 and corrects the OCV-SOC map, rather than simply reading the OCV-SOC map.

OCV-SOC map estimating part 110 estimates a relationship between an OCV and an SOC of a battery, based on an estimated polarization voltage and an estimated SOC estimated by Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104 and on charge-discharge current value i_(L) and terminal voltage value v_(T) which sensor 100 detects and outputs.

An equation of state used by OCV-SOC map estimating part 110 is given by the following formula:

$\begin{matrix} {{x\left\lbrack {k + 1} \right\rbrack} = {{x\lbrack k\rbrack} = \begin{bmatrix} {b_{0}\lbrack k\rbrack} \\ {b_{1}\lbrack k\rbrack} \end{bmatrix}}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\mspace{14mu} 32} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

An output equation is given by:

v _(T) [k]=[1 SOC[k]]x[k]+v _(p) [k]  [Formula 33]

The regression coefficient, [b₀, b₁]^(T), is used in a linear approximation for ease of calculation, but a determinant [b₀, b₁, b₂, . . . b_(N)]^(T) is used in the case of a polynomial of degree n.

A process performed by OCV-SOC map estimating part 110 will be described.

First, in OCV-SOC map regression coefficient estimation processing 300, random numbers are regularly generated in accordance with a random walk, using the output formula (Formula 32), and the regression coefficient, [b₀, b₁]^(T), is estimated.

Then, in terminal voltage estimation processing 301, a terminal voltage is estimated from an estimated polarization voltage and an estimated SOC output from Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104 and on random numbers generated in OCV-SOC map regression coefficient estimation processing 300. Then, in error calculation processing 303, an error is calculated between estimated terminal voltage v_(T) [k] estimated in terminal voltage estimation processing 301 and measured terminal voltage v_(T) output from sensor 100. Then, in Kalman gain processing 304, Kalman gain is calculated, based on the error calculated in error calculation processing 303. Then, in estimated value correction processing 302, the regression coefficient, [b₀, b₁]^(T), serving as a state variable is corrected using, as a correction rate, the Kalman gain calculated in Kalman gain processing 304. The corrected regression coefficient is output to Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104.

OCV-SOC map estimating part 110 may operate to perform the estimation processing over a longer period than does Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104, as with the period with which remaining battery capacity estimation part 106 operates to perform the estimation processing. This configuration prevents accuracy of the estimation from decreasing, as in the case of SOC estimation part 106.

The exemplary embodiments of the present invention have been described. It should be noted that the elements and methods described in the exemplary embodiments of the present invention are not of limitation, and can be modified as appropriate without departing from the scope of the present invention. For example, in the exemplary embodiments of the present invention, the equivalent circuit parameters are estimated using ARX model identifying part 101 and equivalent circuit parameter estimating part 102, but the equivalent circuit parameters may be estimated by Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104. Additionally, ARX model identifying part 101 and equivalent circuit parameter estimating part 102 may be eliminated by including the equivalent circuit parameter in an equation of state used by Kalman filter SOC estimating part 104. Further, ARX model identifying part 101 may be eliminated also by using other models other than ARX models, and other methods.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

The battery state estimation device and the method of estimating a battery state according to the exemplary embodiments of the present invention are useful for detecting a state of a lead-acid battery for use in starting, especially, a vehicle designed with a stop-start system.

REFERENCE MARKS IN THE DRAWINGS

-   -   100 sensor     -   101 ARX model identifying part     -   102 equivalent circuit parameter estimating part     -   103 OCV-SOC map storing part     -   104 Kalman filter SOC estimating part     -   105 error calculating part     -   106 remaining battery capacity estimating part     -   110 OCV-SOC map estimating part     -   200 current integration SOC estimation processing     -   201, 302, 402 estimated value correction processing     -   202 OCV estimation processing     -   203 inversely proportional curve-applied model processing     -   204, 304, 404 Kalman gain processing     -   205, 303, 403 error calculation processing     -   300 OCV-SOC map regression coefficient estimation processing     -   301 terminal voltage estimation processing     -   400 remaining capacity estimation processing     -   401 current integration SOC estimation processing 

1. A battery state estimation device comprising: a detecting part for detecting a charge-discharge current and a terminal voltage of a battery; a state-of-charge (SOC) estimating part for estimating a SOC of the battery, based on the charge-discharge current detected by the detecting part; an open-circuit voltage (OCV) estimating part for estimating an OCV of the battery, based on the SOC estimated by the SOC estimating part and on a relationship between an OCV and the SOC of the battery; a terminal voltage estimating part for calculating an estimated terminal voltage, based on the charge-discharge current and the terminal voltage detected by the detecting part and on an equivalent circuit model constructed using an inversely proportional curve; and a correcting part for correcting the SOC estimated by the SOC estimating part, based on the estimated terminal voltage calculated by the terminal voltage estimating part and on the terminal voltage detected by the detecting part.
 2. The battery state estimation device according to claim 1, wherein the equivalent circuit model constructed using the inversely proportional curve is constructed using a function that is inversely proportional to a power.
 3. The battery state estimation device according to claim 2, further comprising an equivalent circuit parameter estimating part for estimating a parameter of an inversely proportional power of the equivalent circuit model, based on the charge-discharge current and the terminal voltage detected by the detecting part.
 4. The battery state estimation device according to claim 3, wherein the equivalent circuit parameter estimating part sets a component corresponding to a resistance of the equivalent circuit model so that the component equals a value obtained by multiplying, by a constant, a reference resistance value calculated using a first-order equivalent circuit model constructed using an exponential function.
 5. The battery state estimation device according to claim 4, wherein the equivalent circuit parameter estimating part sets a multiplying factor for the calculated resistance value in charging and sets a different multiplying factor for the calculated resistance value in discharging.
 6. The battery state estimation device according to claim 5, wherein the correcting part corrects a state of charge (SOC) estimated by the SOC estimating part by using a Kalman filter.
 7. The battery state estimation device according to claim 6, further comprising a relationship storing part for storing a relationship between an open circuit voltage (OCV) and a state of charge (SOC) of the battery, based on the charge-discharge current and the terminal voltage detected by the detecting part.
 8. The battery state estimation device according to claim 6, further comprising a remaining battery capacity estimating part for estimating a remaining battery capacity so that a state of charge (SOC) estimated by the SOC estimating part equals an SOC calculated from the charge-discharge current detected by the detecting part using a current integration method, wherein the remaining battery capacity estimating part operates over a longer period than that of the SOC estimating part.
 9. The battery state estimation device according to claim 6, further comprising a relationship estimating part for estimating a relationship between an open circuit voltage (OCV) and a state of charge (SOC) of the battery, based on an SOC and a polarization voltage estimated by the SOC estimating part and on a charge-discharge current and a terminal voltage detected by the detecting part, wherein the relationship estimating part estimates a regression coefficient approximated using a regression equation of any order, and corrects the regression coefficient, based on an SOC estimated by the SOC estimating part and on an error between a terminal voltage calculated using both a resistance or a polarization voltage of the equivalent circuit model and a terminal voltage detected by the detecting part.
 10. The battery state estimation device according to claim 1, wherein the battery is a lead-acid battery for use in a vehicle having a stop-start system, and the state of charge (SOC) estimating part, the open circuit voltage (OCV) estimating part, the terminal voltage estimating part, and the correcting part are set for the lead-acid battery.
 11. A method of estimating a battery state comprising: detecting a charge-discharge current and a terminal voltage of a battery; estimating a state of charge (SOC) of the battery, based on the detected charge-discharge current; estimating an open circuit voltage (OCV) of the battery, based on the estimated SOC and a relationship between an OCV and an SOC of the battery; calculating an estimated terminal voltage, based on the detected charge-discharge current and the detected terminal voltage and on an equivalent circuit model constructed using a function that is inversely proportional to a power; and correcting the estimated SOC, based on the calculated terminal voltage and the detected terminal voltage. 